Hello, Griffinofwales, and welcome to the Simple English Wiktionary!
If you want to talk with other members or ask a question, you can visit Wiktionary:Simple talk. Administrators can also help you with more difficult problems. You can also ask me for help. The best way to do that is to leave a message on my talk page. Just remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.
They are enabled here. You need to go to "my settings", select the "gagets" tab, and enable them for yourself.--Brett 12:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I just granted you rollback rights. Have fun :) Barras 19:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I am uncomfortable contributing to this project; but sometimes I can imagine no better language choice in the context of a simple:Wikipedia article. In other words, I am only interested in adding to entries in this venue when it appears needed by what I've written . Thus far, I have created three problematic edits. Arguably, they serve the purposes I had in mind; but I do not want to create unintended consequences.
I would appreciate feedback about the following:
- In the stub I created about the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, I wrote:
- The illustrative example identifies Australian natives as aboriginals. I was trying to be sensitive to a cultural preference in Canada which is reflected in the first sentence at Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Happily, my edit was reverted by a self-identified Canadian here
- My question to you is this: Why was my rationale wrong or inappropriate? Alternately, if a timely re-visit to this edit of wikt:native is plausibly necessary, what is the next step?
- I added one related word: governance -- without defining it further?
- In the stub I created about the Edo period of the history of Japan, I wrote
- Frankly, I didn't know whether "governance" is the best word in the context. I copied it from Edo period. I liked it because it allowed for the possibility of a kind of en:fuzzy logic which is appropriate to changing relationships between the Imperial court and the shogunate during the period.
- I added three related words: functional; functionally; functionality -- without defining them?
- In the stub I created about the Kamakura period, I wrote:
- Although the inline citation support is different, and the different shogunates are distinct administrative entitles, the sense of fuzzy logic in the marriage of "governance" and "functional" seems on-point.
I worry that this is simply wrong in a simple:Wikipedia context?
With appropriate inline citation support, I plan to use a similar pairing of the words "governance" and "functional" in writing about the Asuka period, the Nara period, the Heian period, the Nonboku-chō period and the Muramachi period. FYI: See tables in List of Emperors of Japan and Japanese era name.
- I was questioning the necessity of a dictionary definition if an encyclopedic article on it already exists. Griffinofwales (talk) 23:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Wiktionary is not the place for encyclopedia articles. So were you suggesting that we send users to Wikipedia via interwiki link? Immunize (talk) 20:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)