Jump to content

Wiktionary:Requests for deletion

From Wiktionary
(Redirected from Wiktionary:RfD)
Shortcut:
WT:RFD

This page is for deletion requests, for when you think a page should be deleted. See our deletion rules for more information. Old requests can be found here.

Listing for deletion

[change]

Start each deletion request with a link to the page (put the page name in brackets: [[like this]] = like this), then with your reason(s) the page should be deleted. Sign and date your deletion request automatically with ~~~~ (four tildes).

Quick deletion

[change]

Remember to put {{delete|reason}} at the top of a page for quick deletion requests ("reason" should be replaced by your reason for the request):

This type of deletion request does not need to be listed on this page.

Regular deletion

[change]

For regular requests, put {{delreq|reason}} at the top of a page, and list it here under "Deletion requests". That template will add this:

Not all deletion requests are listed here. There are probably more in Category:Deletion requests.

An example entry:

===[[genericwordtobedeleted]]===
This entry is redundant, not notable, and all in all one that doesn't belong in a dictionary.  -- ~~~~
*'''Delete'''.  -- ~~~~

Voting on deletion requests

[change]

If you wish to vote on a deletion, give your vote (delete, keep, move, comment, etc.), your reason(s), and your signature as above. One vote per username will be counted on each request. Creating a second account to vote more than once is called creating a sockpuppet. While you may create as many accounts as you want, the same person will not be allowed to vote more than once, even if he or she uses a different account. The same person may comment on a single request as much as he or she wishes.

Quick deletion requests

[change]

This section is for pages that should be quickly deleted. Few pages belong in this section. If a page should be quickly deleted, putting {{delete}} at the top of the page is enough. Most pages should be discussed in the next section before being deleted. Only copyright violations, vandalism, etc. should be listed here.

Deletion requests

[change]
Pages are deleted if there is no opposition to the request after 7 days

Wiktionary is not an encyclopaedia, and this is an encyclopaedic page. BritTrainLover801 (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC)reply

Y Done MathXplore (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2025 (UTC)reply

Doesn't seem to be a valid word. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:40, 24 July 2025 (UTC)reply

Y Done MathXplore (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC)reply

Seems out of our project's scope. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:09, 26 July 2025 (UTC)reply

appears in many books on irish surnames and clans:
https://archive.org/details/irishfamiliesthe00macl/page/102/mode/2up?view=theater&q=Comain
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hiGyDgAAQBAJ&dq=commane+%C3%93+Com%C3%A1in&pg=PT60&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=commane%20%C3%93%20Com%C3%A1in&f=false Committeeinstructive (talk) 12:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)reply
N Not done no consensus MathXplore (talk) 00:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Doesn't seem to be a valid word and out of scope. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)reply

Seems like a valid transliteration as per en:w:Brahmamuhurta. But is it still within scope considering that our scope are English words? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:37, 9 August 2025 (UTC)reply
Y Done MathXplore (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2025 (UTC)reply

Sum of parts. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)reply

African American is also a sum of African and American if you seriously think about it. Yongdrag (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2025 (UTC)reply
@MathXplore: could you take a look please? --Ferien (talk) 00:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply
N Not done no consensus MathXplore (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Sum of parts. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)reply

Fictional place. Out of scope. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 17 August 2025 (UTC)reply

Y Done MathXplore (talk) 06:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)reply

Doesn't seem to be a valid word. No quotations. Defined only as "to dust again", i.e. re- + dust. I cannot find three independent, durably archived uses spanning more than a year. Mainstream dictionaries (Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, Collins Dictionary, Oxford Adavanced Learner's Dictionary, Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English) do not enter it; ordinary usage seems to prefer re-dust or dust again. Please verify or delete.

--0x48fe75df30 (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)reply