Template:Logo vote old

1. Very clear & visible; alternative is vague & unclear. Macdonald-Ross (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
2. Clear and concise. The alternative is vague and the book image is too small to be seen properly, especially the symbolic "puzzle piece". You can barely tell it's a book, much less a dictionary. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

   In reply to #2: Please see File:Wiki3.png. It clearly states that the image might be edited to fit into the site logo. Hydriz (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

   Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but how does that change anything? The site logo will remain the same pixel size, even if the book image is edited in some way it still has to be shrunken down to that size. Tempodivalse [talk] 19:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

3. Clearly seen; the book image is too difficult to see. Mikemoral♪♫ 22:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
4. This one per all above, also per Hydriz/PrincessofLyr/Barliner on the other side. Oh the irony. Bluegoblin7 (talk) 17:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
5. I completely support the old one Addihockey10 (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
6. I like our current one better, It looks better. I would not mind going to the one most other Wiktionary's use. Tofutwitch11 (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
7. per all of the above.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
8. I'm not a fan of this or the book, but I like this one more.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 20:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)