Category talk:Grammar templates

Untitled

How does this differ from context templates?--Brett 18:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm...as things currently stand, I don't think it does. It looks like Wenli put the category on 2 pages and then I created it because it was a "wanted" category. I must not have been thinking properly because I usually double-check things like that. Anyways, I see a possible need for making a distinction (now) between the two. Grammar templates would be things like the current "pluralonly" and "countable", as well as things like "transitive", "CU noun" and "refl pron"--basically anything related to the grammar context of a word. Category:Grammar templates could then be a sub-category of Category:Context labels and we could keep templates like "physics", "music", "grammar context", etc. in the latter category. Thoughts? · Tygrrr... 18:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I think that sounds like a good plan.--Brett 18:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)