User talk:Hydriz

From Wiktionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page.


New blocked text[change]

Hi there Hydriz!,can you change the blocked text please.

You are currently unable to change Wiktionary.

You can still read pages, but you cannot change, or create them.

Changing from $7 has been blocked by $1 for the following reason(s):

$2

This block has been set to finish: $6.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to change your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail.

Note: Please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Username policy · Appealing blocks: policy and guide

If the block notice is unclear, or it does not appear to relate to your actions, please ask for assistance as described at Help:I have been blocked.

2600:1006:B11E:7DC7:A755:7698:A670:7639 (talk) 18:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

w:simple:User:Chenzw/Reports/Pakistan[change]

You may want to note the above report, which is why I nominated the pages related to Pakistan for deletion. --Rschen7754 22:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I am having doubts about whether or not to delete those pages because they look very legitimate to me, but of course it is getting a real pain to have so many Pakistani entries being created. Do add your comment here regarding the deletion of those pages. Cheers. --Hydriz (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Good work![change]

Hi Hydriz! You've done a really good work on the recent clean up you've done! Thanks for doing all that nasty work! -Barras talk 10:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! There is a lot more to be done though, hopefully I can work on those as well? --Hydriz (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent blitz of edits has been quite impressive. Thank you for your time and effort!--Brett (talk) 07:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! :) --Hydriz (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Reason[change]

[1] - here, you reverted my edit. I understand that it's suppose to be "change", apologies. But, I hope you know that this is an inappropriate use of the rollback tool, you should only use it for pure vandalism. Instead, for these cases, please us the undo function, and state your reason their. Thanks! --~~Goldenburg111 16:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Simple English wikipedia. Does its ban against me affect my ability to edit here?[change]

Hello, I was banned from Simple English wikipedia. I believe its ok for me to edit here, because I believe Simple English wiktionary is separate from wikipedia, am I correct or mistaken?PaulBustion88 (talk) 05:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, the Simple English Wiktionary is separate from the Simple English Wikipedia. However, we do have rules that you should continue to follow, and you may be blocked from changing pages if you do violate them here too. Cheers. --Hydriz (talk) 05:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Is there anything wrong with my edits so far? In particular I want to know if there was anything wrong with my edit to puberty,https://simple.wiktionary.org/wiki/puberty, because that was the article on Simple English I was most criticized for changing.--PaulBustion88 (talk) 05:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
It seems fine to me, thank you for expanding the definition! If you need more help, do feel free to contact me or leave a message on Wiktionary:Simple talk. --Hydriz (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
On English wikipedia and simple English wikipedia, I was criticized for calling pedophilia an adult sexual attraction to prepubescent children, because of the fact that the minimum age for diagnosis is 16, while the age of majority is usually 18, so they said calling a 16-17 year old an adult in this context is inappropriate, but I think saying "adult or adolescent" sounds kind of awkward, and I think it would be reasonable to say that in the sense of the word adult that is being used when diagnosing a pedophile by a psychiatrist a 16 year old could be considered in that sense because he/she has completed his/her sexual development and although he/she has not completed mental development, he/she has a partially adult mind, its not a legal term, so we're obviously not talking about adult in the sense of the age of majority or age of consent for sex when we use the term while discussing pedophilia. Is it ok to just say "adult" in the definition instead of saying "adult or adolescent" since they are adults in the sense that we are discussing here, or is that to atypical a use of language?--PaulBustion88 (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
We do not have a "rule" on that, so I believe it is fine. Other editors are welcome to make changes on what you have written, so such a problem would not be significant. --Hydriz (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Authors wants deletion 7 rule mistake Apology[change]

I am sorry for blanking the page since that rule does not apply in this case. Sorry for misinterpreting the rule. I apologize. --PaulBustion88 (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm leaving[change]

I decided to leave simple English wiktionary. It seems like I do a bad job no matter where I edit. --PaulBustion88 (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)